Modi’s Tianjin Embrace of Xi and Putin Sends a Signal to Washington
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s warm optics with China’s Xi Jinping and Russia’s Vladimir Putin reflect New Delhi’s calibrated pushback after recent tensions with the United States.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s public warmth toward China’s Xi Jinping and Russia’s Vladimir Putin in Tianjin on Monday amounted to a clear diplomatic signal to Washington, officials and analysts said, coming amid a recent deterioration in U.S.-India economic ties.
Photographs and video from the meeting showed the three leaders smiling, exchanging handshakes and holding hands in a series of cordial gestures. The display undercut expectations that India would remain unequivocally aligned with Washington as its principal strategic partner and underscored New Delhi’s effort to demonstrate independence in its foreign policy.

For more than two decades New Delhi has steadily expanded economic and security ties with the United States and other Western partners, even as it maintained longstanding relations with Moscow. India was an early participant in the so-called Quad framework, created in 2007, and has engaged in joint military exercises with the U.S. and other partners while liberalizing its economy to attract American investment.
The recent public embrace of China and Russia follows a string of tensions in U.S.-India relations. Officials in New Delhi and Washington reported a terse phone call between Modi and President Donald Trump in June, and the United States imposed tariffs of 50 percent on a range of Indian goods last month, among the highest levies by Washington on any trading partner. New Delhi has criticized those measures as punitive and said they harm Indian exporters.
Moscow and New Delhi have signaled deepening engagement ahead of a scheduled visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin later this year. Indian officials described the forthcoming visit as part of a long-standing strategic partnership rather than a pivot toward a new formal alliance. Chinese leaders, too, are seeking to consolidate ties with India through high-level diplomacy even as Beijing and New Delhi continue to manage border frictions and regional competition.
Analysts said the Tianjin interaction should be viewed as a calibrated diplomatic maneuver rather than the formation of a new three-way bloc. The optics, they argued, were intended principally as a message to Washington: that New Delhi will resist coercive economic and political pressure and preserve the freedom to engage across the major power spectrum.
"India has long practiced strategic autonomy," said an international affairs analyst. "These gestures reaffirm New Delhi's ability to balance relationships without being forced into a single camp."
The development complicates Washington’s effort to maintain and deepen a strategic partnership with India on technology, defense and regional security issues. U.S. officials have long valued India as a counterweight to Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific and as a partner on supply-chain resilience, defense procurement and intelligence sharing. The new tensions over tariffs and trade policy, alongside high-profile public diplomacy with Beijing and Moscow, will require active engagement from both sides if the relationship is to rebound.
New Delhi’s approach reflects both immediate economic grievances and a longer-term pattern of diversification. Indian leaders have repeatedly emphasized that foreign policy will prioritize national interests, preserve sovereignty and seek multiple strategic partnerships. That posture has produced closer coordination with the United States on some security issues while also permitting transactional ties with Russia and expanding diplomatic contact with China.
How the United States responds in coming months could determine whether the Tianjin episode is a temporary diplomatic retort or the opening of a more sustained European-style multilateral balancing act in Asia. Modi’s meeting with Xi and Putin underscores New Delhi’s intent to retain maneuverability among great powers, even as it manages competing economic and security pressures.
Officials in New Delhi have not announced any formal changes to defense arrangements or trade agreements following the Tianjin meeting. Putin’s scheduled visit and the U.S. tariffs will be watched closely for indications of whether the encounter presages a deeper realignment or a short-term strategic message in a fraught diplomatic moment.